当前位置: 首页 > 工具软件 > iNet > 使用案例 >

linux网络子系统分析(四)—— INET连接建立API分析之connect/accept

屠杰
2023-12-01

目录

一、概述

二、connect

2.1 connect流程

2.1.1 路由查找

2.1.2 connect端口分配

2.1.3 再次查找路由

2.1.4 初始化seq

2.1.5 构造并发送SYN

三、三次握手主要流程


一、概述

主要关注流程,其他如滑动窗口变化等后续文章统一分析。

二、connect

connect的函数原型是:

  • int connect(int sockfd, const struct sockaddr *addr, socklen_t addrlen);

connect执行主动打开,发起三次握手,函数参数前面已经说过。

2.1 connect流程

2.1.1 路由查找

从inet_stream_connect->tcp_v4_connect,内容较多,分段来看

[net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c]

int tcp_v4_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len)
{
	struct sockaddr_in *usin = (struct sockaddr_in *)uaddr;
	struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
	__be16 orig_sport, orig_dport;
	__be32 daddr, nexthop;
	struct flowi4 *fl4;
	struct rtable *rt;
	int err;
	struct ip_options_rcu *inet_opt;
	struct inet_timewait_death_row *tcp_death_row = &sock_net(sk)->ipv4.tcp_death_row;

	nexthop = daddr = usin->sin_addr.s_addr;
	inet_opt = rcu_dereference_protected(inet->inet_opt,
					     lockdep_sock_is_held(sk));
    ...
	orig_sport = inet->inet_sport;
	orig_dport = usin->sin_port;
	fl4 = &inet->cork.fl.u.ip4;
	rt = ip_route_connect(fl4, nexthop, inet->inet_saddr,
			      RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk), sk->sk_bound_dev_if,
			      IPPROTO_TCP,
			      orig_sport, orig_dport, sk);

	if (!inet->inet_saddr)
		inet->inet_saddr = fl4->saddr;
	sk_rcv_saddr_set(sk, inet->inet_saddr);

	if (tp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp && inet->inet_daddr != daddr) {
		/* Reset inherited state */
		tp->rx_opt.ts_recent	   = 0;
		tp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp = 0;
		if (likely(!tp->repair))
			tp->write_seq	   = 0;
	}

	inet->inet_dport = usin->sin_port;
	sk_daddr_set(sk, daddr);

	inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ext_hdr_len = 0;
	if (inet_opt)
		inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ext_hdr_len = inet_opt->opt.optlen;

	tp->rx_opt.mss_clamp = TCP_MSS_DEFAULT;
  • 上面的片段就是做一些基本的配置,为建立连接做准备,这里先不考虑ip_option的情况
  • 首先构造flowi,并通过ip_route_connect查路由
  • 如果没有bind的话,在路由查找后填充一下源IP: inet->inet_saddr
  • 此时dport和daddr也填充一下

2.1.2 connect端口分配

一般情况下,用户不指定sport,这时候要自动分配,这中情况下主要考虑sport和bind时的冲突,以及sport是否和ehash有冲突

tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_SYN_SENT);
err = inet_hash_connect(tcp_death_row, sk);
if (err)
	goto failure;
sk_set_txhash(sk);

[net/ipv4/inet_hashtables.c]

int inet_hash_connect(struct inet_timewait_death_row *death_row,
		      struct sock *sk)
{
	u32 port_offset = 0;

	if (!inet_sk(sk)->inet_num)
		port_offset = inet_sk_port_offset(sk);
	return __inet_hash_connect(death_row, sk, port_offset,
				   __inet_check_established);
}
  • 其中port_offset是一个搜索端口号的偏移

下面分段看一下核心的__inet_hash_connect函数,先来看已经bind的情形:

int __inet_hash_connect(struct inet_timewait_death_row *death_row,
		struct sock *sk, u32 port_offset,
		int (*check_established)(struct inet_timewait_death_row *,
			struct sock *, __u16, struct inet_timewait_sock **))
{
	struct inet_hashinfo *hinfo = death_row->hashinfo;
	struct inet_timewait_sock *tw = NULL;
	struct inet_bind_hashbucket *head;
	int port = inet_sk(sk)->inet_num;
	struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
	struct inet_bind_bucket *tb;
	u32 remaining, offset;
	int ret, i, low, high;
	static u32 hint;

	if (port) {
		head = &hinfo->bhash[inet_bhashfn(net, port,
						  hinfo->bhash_size)];
		tb = inet_csk(sk)->icsk_bind_hash;
		spin_lock_bh(&head->lock);
		if (sk_head(&tb->owners) == sk && !sk->sk_bind_node.next) {
			inet_ehash_nolisten(sk, NULL);
			spin_unlock_bh(&head->lock);
			return 0;
		}
		spin_unlock(&head->lock);
		/* No definite answer... Walk to established hash table */
		ret = check_established(death_row, sk, port, NULL);
		local_bh_enable();
		return ret;
	}
  • 由于已经bind过了,所以一定能找到对应的tb,如果当前只有一个sk,那么直接使用inet_ehash_nolisten,这意味着在ehash的四元组检测中一定不会有冲突,因为bhash的二元组检测是比ehash的四元组检测更为严格的。
  • 如果tb->owner承载不止一个sk,意味着sk的二元组是存在多个的,这时候要进一步检测ehash,这意味着另一个sk可能已经使用ehash建立了连接,这部分放到后面说。

inet_ehash_nolisten就是将sk插到ehash中,同时删除冲突的osk,当然上面这种情况下,只有sk一个socket,因此第二个参数为NULL,看一下其核心函数inet_ehash_insert

bool inet_ehash_insert(struct sock *sk, struct sock *osk)
{
	struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo = sk->sk_prot->h.hashinfo;
	struct hlist_nulls_head *list;
	struct inet_ehash_bucket *head;
	spinlock_t *lock;
	bool ret = true;

	WARN_ON_ONCE(!sk_unhashed(sk));

	sk->sk_hash = sk_ehashfn(sk);
	head = inet_ehash_bucket(hashinfo, sk->sk_hash);
	list = &head->chain;
	lock = inet_ehash_lockp(hashinfo, sk->sk_hash);

	spin_lock(lock);
	if (osk) {
		WARN_ON_ONCE(sk->sk_hash != osk->sk_hash);
		ret = sk_nulls_del_node_init_rcu(osk);
	}
	if (ret)
		__sk_nulls_add_node_rcu(sk, list);
	spin_unlock(lock);
	return ret;
}
  • 流程上没有什么特别的,这里需要注意一下hash函数,hash key是四元组(saddr, sport, daddr, dport)
static u32 sk_ehashfn(const struct sock *sk)
{
    ...
	return inet_ehashfn(sock_net(sk),
			    sk->sk_rcv_saddr, sk->sk_num,
			    sk->sk_daddr, sk->sk_dport);
}

下面来看一下未bind情况下分配端口号的情况,和bind时情况类似,只不过优先分配偶数端口号:

	inet_get_local_port_range(net, &low, &high);
	high++; /* [32768, 60999] -> [32768, 61000[ */
	remaining = high - low;
	if (likely(remaining > 1))
		remaining &= ~1U;

	offset = (hint + port_offset) % remaining;
	/* In first pass we try ports of @low parity.
	 * inet_csk_get_port() does the opposite choice.
	 */
	offset &= ~1U;

搜索上也是类似的

other_parity_scan:
	port = low + offset;
	for (i = 0; i < remaining; i += 2, port += 2) {
		if (unlikely(port >= high))
			port -= remaining;
		if (inet_is_local_reserved_port(net, port))
			continue;
		head = &hinfo->bhash[inet_bhashfn(net, port,
						  hinfo->bhash_size)];
		spin_lock_bh(&head->lock);

		/* Does not bother with rcv_saddr checks, because
		 * the established check is already unique enough.
		 */
		inet_bind_bucket_for_each(tb, &head->chain) {
			if (net_eq(ib_net(tb), net) && tb->port == port) {
				if (tb->fastreuse >= 0 ||
				    tb->fastreuseport >= 0)
					goto next_port;
				WARN_ON(hlist_empty(&tb->owners));
				if (!check_established(death_row, sk,
						       port, &tw))
					goto ok;
				goto next_port;
			}
		}
  • connect的时候还是要先检查一下bhash,一般情况下,如果选择的sport在ehash中可以找到,就尝试下一个,即不要和bind及可能bind的socket产生冲突

可以看到:

				if (tb->fastreuse >= 0 ||
				    tb->fastreuseport >= 0)
					goto next_port;

我们在bind是看过,fastreuse,fastreuseport总是>=0的,所以这里的逻辑是connect时sprot选择只要和bhash port相同,就尝试下一个。如果是connect自己的sport产生冲突,就将fastreuse = -1,这样就进入establish状态的冲突的检测:

static int __inet_check_established(struct inet_timewait_death_row *death_row,
				    struct sock *sk, __u16 lport,
				    struct inet_timewait_sock **twp)
{
    ...
	sk_nulls_for_each(sk2, node, &head->chain) {
		if (sk2->sk_hash != hash)
			continue;

		if (likely(INET_MATCH(sk2, net, acookie,
					 saddr, daddr, ports, dif, sdif))) {
			if (sk2->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT) {
				tw = inet_twsk(sk2);
				if (twsk_unique(sk, sk2, twp))
					break;
			}
			goto not_unique;
		}
	}
}

在不考虑TIME_WAIT状态下,使用四元组唯一的确定connect是否冲突:

比较的方式:

#define INET_MATCH(__sk, __net, __cookie, __saddr, __daddr, __ports, __dif, __sdif) \
	(((__sk)->sk_portpair == (__ports))			&&	\
	 ((__sk)->sk_addrpair == (__cookie))			&&	\
	 (!(__sk)->sk_bound_dev_if	||				\
	   ((__sk)->sk_bound_dev_if == (__dif))			||	\
	   ((__sk)->sk_bound_dev_if == (__sdif)))		&&	\
	 net_eq(sock_net(__sk), (__net)))

另外还要对tw状态的sk进行检测

static inline int twsk_unique(struct sock *sk, struct sock *sktw, void *twp)
{
	if (sk->sk_prot->twsk_prot->twsk_unique != NULL)
		return sk->sk_prot->twsk_prot->twsk_unique(sk, sktw, twp);
	return 0;
}

如果ehash检测没有问题,就加入ehash,此时inet的源端口已经是确定了。

	inet->inet_num = lport;
	inet->inet_sport = htons(lport);
	sk->sk_hash = hash;
	WARN_ON(!sk_unhashed(sk));
	__sk_nulls_add_node_rcu(sk, &head->chain);
	if (tw) {
		sk_nulls_del_node_init_rcu((struct sock *)tw);
		__NET_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_TIMEWAITRECYCLED);
	}

ehash检测通过后,将sk加入bhash

ok:
	hint += i + 2;

	/* Head lock still held and bh's disabled */
	inet_bind_hash(sk, tb, port);
	if (sk_unhashed(sk)) {
		inet_sk(sk)->inet_sport = htons(port);
		inet_ehash_nolisten(sk, (struct sock *)tw);
	}
	if (tw)
		inet_twsk_bind_unhash(tw, hinfo);
	spin_unlock(&head->lock);
	if (tw)
		inet_twsk_deschedule_put(tw);
  • sk_unhashed(sk) 检测有没有加入ehash,在bhash检测时,如果port没有冲突,会走到这部分,此时可以直接加入到ehash中。

2.1.3 再次查找路由

	rt = ip_route_newports(fl4, rt, orig_sport, orig_dport,
			       inet->inet_sport, inet->inet_dport, sk);
	if (IS_ERR(rt)) {
		err = PTR_ERR(rt);
		rt = NULL;
		goto failure;
	}
	/* OK, now commit destination to socket.  */
	sk->sk_gso_type = SKB_GSO_TCPV4;
	sk_setup_caps(sk, &rt->dst);
  • 如果源端口分配后,新旧源端口或者目的端口有变化,还要重新查找一下路由
  • 设置路由缓存并确定设备的SG特性,这在tcp发包的时候需要
void sk_setup_caps(struct sock *sk, struct dst_entry *dst)
{
	u32 max_segs = 1;

	sk_dst_set(sk, dst);
	sk->sk_route_caps = dst->dev->features | sk->sk_route_forced_caps;
	if (sk->sk_route_caps & NETIF_F_GSO)
		sk->sk_route_caps |= NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE;
	sk->sk_route_caps &= ~sk->sk_route_nocaps;
	if (sk_can_gso(sk)) {
		if (dst->header_len && !xfrm_dst_offload_ok(dst)) {
			sk->sk_route_caps &= ~NETIF_F_GSO_MASK;
		} else {
			sk->sk_route_caps |= NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM;
			sk->sk_gso_max_size = dst->dev->gso_max_size;
			max_segs = max_t(u32, dst->dev->gso_max_segs, 1);
		}
	}
	sk->sk_gso_max_segs = max_segs;
}

2.1.4 初始化seq

	if (likely(!tp->repair)) {
		if (!tp->write_seq)
			tp->write_seq = secure_tcp_seq(inet->inet_saddr,
						       inet->inet_daddr,
						       inet->inet_sport,
						       usin->sin_port);
		tp->tsoffset = secure_tcp_ts_off(sock_net(sk),
						 inet->inet_saddr,
						 inet->inet_daddr);
	}

	inet->inet_id = tp->write_seq ^ jiffies;

2.1.5 构造并发送SYN

主要的函数是tcp_connect

[net/ipv4/tcp_output.c]

int tcp_connect(struct sock *sk)
{
	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
	struct sk_buff *buff;
	int err;

	tcp_call_bpf(sk, BPF_SOCK_OPS_TCP_CONNECT_CB, 0, NULL);

	if (inet_csk(sk)->icsk_af_ops->rebuild_header(sk))
		return -EHOSTUNREACH; /* Routing failure or similar. */

	tcp_connect_init(sk);

	if (unlikely(tp->repair)) {
		tcp_finish_connect(sk, NULL);
		return 0;
	}

	buff = sk_stream_alloc_skb(sk, 0, sk->sk_allocation, true);
	if (unlikely(!buff))
		return -ENOBUFS;

	tcp_init_nondata_skb(buff, tp->write_seq++, TCPHDR_SYN);
	tcp_mstamp_refresh(tp);
	tp->retrans_stamp = tcp_time_stamp(tp);
	tcp_connect_queue_skb(sk, buff);
	tcp_ecn_send_syn(sk, buff);
	tcp_rbtree_insert(&sk->tcp_rtx_queue, buff);

	/* Send off SYN; include data in Fast Open. */
	err = tp->fastopen_req ? tcp_send_syn_data(sk, buff) :
	      tcp_transmit_skb(sk, buff, 1, sk->sk_allocation);
	if (err == -ECONNREFUSED)
		return err;

	/* We change tp->snd_nxt after the tcp_transmit_skb() call
	 * in order to make this packet get counted in tcpOutSegs.
	 */
	tp->snd_nxt = tp->write_seq;
	tp->pushed_seq = tp->write_seq;
	buff = tcp_send_head(sk);
	if (unlikely(buff)) {
		tp->snd_nxt	= TCP_SKB_CB(buff)->seq;
		tp->pushed_seq	= TCP_SKB_CB(buff)->seq;
	}
	TCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), TCP_MIB_ACTIVEOPENS);

	/* Timer for repeating the SYN until an answer. */
	inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer(sk, ICSK_TIME_RETRANS,
				  inet_csk(sk)->icsk_rto, TCP_RTO_MAX);
	return 0;
}

还是一段一段来看,tcp_connect首先使用tcp_connect_init对sk进行初始化,接着分配skb,最终调用tcp_connect_queue_skb发送SYN。

三、三次握手主要流程

三次握手流程对照TCP状态图很好理解,这里主要结合源码分析一下,tcp接收入口是tcp_v4_rcv,我把主要流程贴在下面:

int tcp_v4_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
...

lookup:
	sk = __inet_lookup_skb(&tcp_hashinfo, skb, __tcp_hdrlen(th), th->source,
			       th->dest, &refcounted);
	if (!sk)
		goto no_tcp_socket;

process:
	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT)
		goto do_time_wait;

    ...

	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
		ret = tcp_v4_do_rcv(sk, skb);
		goto put_and_return;
	}

	if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
		if (!tcp_prequeue(sk, skb))
			ret = tcp_v4_do_rcv(sk, skb);
	} else if (tcp_add_backlog(sk, skb)) {
		goto discard_and_relse;
	}
}

收到一个报文,要先看其和那个sk是关联的,这里有两种情况,报文在ehash中,说明三次握手已经建立完成,此时的报文是正常的通信报文;报文在listen hash中,说明报文在握手过程中:

static inline struct sock *__inet_lookup(struct net *net,
					 struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo,
					 struct sk_buff *skb, int doff,
					 const __be32 saddr, const __be16 sport,
					 const __be32 daddr, const __be16 dport,
					 const int dif,
					 bool *refcounted)
{
	u16 hnum = ntohs(dport);
	struct sock *sk;

	sk = __inet_lookup_established(net, hashinfo, saddr, sport,
				       daddr, hnum, dif);
	*refcounted = true;
	if (sk)
		return sk;
	*refcounted = false;
	return __inet_lookup_listener(net, hashinfo, skb, doff, saddr,
				      sport, daddr, hnum, dif);
}

我们知道server经过bind,listen进入TCP_LISTEN状态,在该状态收到的报文进入三次握手处理流程:

int tcp_v4_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
	struct sock *rsk;

	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED) { /* Fast path */
        ...
		return 0;
	}

	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
		struct sock *nsk = tcp_v4_cookie_check(sk, skb);

		if (!nsk)
			goto discard;
		if (nsk != sk) {
			if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) {
				rsk = nsk;
				goto reset;
			}
			return 0;
		}
	} else
		sock_rps_save_rxhash(sk, skb);

	if (tcp_rcv_state_process(sk, skb)) {
		rsk = sk;
		goto reset;
	}
	return 0;
}

上述函数最重要的是tcp_rcv_state_process,这个函数是主要的状态机转换流程(不包括establish,time_wait),看一下LISTEN状态是如何处理的:

	case TCP_LISTEN:
		if (th->ack)
			return 1;

		if (th->rst)
			goto discard;

		if (th->syn) {
			if (th->fin)
				goto discard;
			/* It is possible that we process SYN packets from backlog,
			 * so we need to make sure to disable BH right there.
			 */
			local_bh_disable();
			acceptable = icsk->icsk_af_ops->conn_request(sk, skb) >= 0;
			local_bh_enable();

			if (!acceptable)
				return 1;
			consume_skb(skb);
			return 0;
		}
		goto discard;

跟踪一下tcp_v4_conn_request->tcp_conn_request,这里还是只关注主要流程:

int tcp_conn_request(struct request_sock_ops *rsk_ops,
		     const struct tcp_request_sock_ops *af_ops,
		     struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
	if (sk_acceptq_is_full(sk)) {
		NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_LISTENOVERFLOWS);
		goto drop;
	}

	req = inet_reqsk_alloc(rsk_ops, sk, !want_cookie);

	if (want_cookie && !tmp_opt.saw_tstamp)
		tcp_clear_options(&tmp_opt);

	af_ops->init_req(req, sk, skb);

    ...
	if (!dst) {
		dst = af_ops->route_req(sk, &fl, req);
		if (!dst)
			goto drop_and_free;
	}

	tcp_ecn_create_request(req, skb, sk, dst);

	if (want_cookie) {
		isn = cookie_init_sequence(af_ops, sk, skb, &req->mss);
		req->cookie_ts = tmp_opt.tstamp_ok;
		if (!tmp_opt.tstamp_ok)
			inet_rsk(req)->ecn_ok = 0;
	}

	if (!want_cookie) {
		tcp_reqsk_record_syn(sk, req, skb);
		fastopen_sk = tcp_try_fastopen(sk, skb, req, &foc, dst);
	}
	if (fastopen_sk) {
       ...
	} else {
		tcp_rsk(req)->tfo_listener = false;
		if (!want_cookie)
			inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, TCP_TIMEOUT_INIT);
		af_ops->send_synack(sk, dst, &fl, req, &foc,
				    !want_cookie ? TCP_SYNACK_NORMAL :
						   TCP_SYNACK_COOKIE);
		if (want_cookie) {
			reqsk_free(req);
			return 0;
		}
	}
	reqsk_put(req);
	return 0;
}

这里涉及到所谓半连接队列和全连接队列。一般将SYN请求放入半连接队列,并发送SYN/ACK,当再次收到ACK将连接从半连接队列放入全连接队列。

static inline bool sk_acceptq_is_full(const struct sock *sk)
{
	return sk->sk_ack_backlog > sk->sk_max_ack_backlog;
}

我们看到当前全连接队列的大小sk->sk_max_ack_backlog就是listen的第二个参数,sk->sk_ack_backlog即是当前全连接队列大小。

客户端收到SYN/ACK

	case TCP_SYN_SENT:
		tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
		skb_mstamp_get(&tp->tcp_mstamp);
		queued = tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process(sk, skb, th);
		if (queued >= 0)
			return queued;

		/* Do step6 onward by hand. */
		tcp_urg(sk, skb, th);
		__kfree_skb(skb);
		tcp_data_snd_check(sk);
		return 0;

四、accept

accept本身没有什么好说的

struct sock *inet_csk_accept(struct sock *sk, int flags, int *err, bool kern)
{
	struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
	struct request_sock_queue *queue = &icsk->icsk_accept_queue;
	struct request_sock *req;
	struct sock *newsk;
	int error;

	lock_sock(sk);

	/* We need to make sure that this socket is listening,
	 * and that it has something pending.
	 */
	error = -EINVAL;
	if (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN)
		goto out_err;

	/* Find already established connection */
	if (reqsk_queue_empty(queue)) {
		long timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & O_NONBLOCK);

		/* If this is a non blocking socket don't sleep */
		error = -EAGAIN;
		if (!timeo)
			goto out_err;

		error = inet_csk_wait_for_connect(sk, timeo);
		if (error)
			goto out_err;
	}
	req = reqsk_queue_remove(queue, sk);
	newsk = req->sk;

 ...
}

就是 阻塞等待

static int inet_csk_wait_for_connect(struct sock *sk, long timeo)
{
	struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk);
	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
	int err;

	/*
	 * True wake-one mechanism for incoming connections: only
	 * one process gets woken up, not the 'whole herd'.
	 * Since we do not 'race & poll' for established sockets
	 * anymore, the common case will execute the loop only once.
	 *
	 * Subtle issue: "add_wait_queue_exclusive()" will be added
	 * after any current non-exclusive waiters, and we know that
	 * it will always _stay_ after any new non-exclusive waiters
	 * because all non-exclusive waiters are added at the
	 * beginning of the wait-queue. As such, it's ok to "drop"
	 * our exclusiveness temporarily when we get woken up without
	 * having to remove and re-insert us on the wait queue.
	 */
	for (;;) {
		prepare_to_wait_exclusive(sk_sleep(sk), &wait,
					  TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
		release_sock(sk);
		if (reqsk_queue_empty(&icsk->icsk_accept_queue))
			timeo = schedule_timeout(timeo);
		sched_annotate_sleep();
		lock_sock(sk);
		err = 0;
		if (!reqsk_queue_empty(&icsk->icsk_accept_queue))
			break;
		err = -EINVAL;
		if (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN)
			break;
		err = sock_intr_errno(timeo);
		if (signal_pending(current))
			break;
		err = -EAGAIN;
		if (!timeo)
			break;
	}
	finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
	return err;
}

 

 

 类似资料: