登录
当前位置： 首页 > 编程笔记 >

oracle中使用group by优化distinct

冯枫
2023-03-14
本文向大家介绍oracle中使用group by优化distinct，包括了oracle中使用group by优化distinct的使用技巧和注意事项，需要的朋友参考一下

今天mentor给了一个sql语句优化的任务。（环境是sql developer）有一个语句执行很慢，查询出来的结果有17544条记录，但需970秒，速度很慢。语句是这样的：

SELECT DISTINCT  'AMEND_NEW', 
       reporttitle, 
       reportsubtitle, 
       cab_cab_transactions.branchcode, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_cd, 
       cab_cab_transactions.sstm_scrty_id, 
       cab_cab_transactions.sstm_trx_id, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trde_dttm, 
       cab_cab_transactions.efcte_dttm, 
       cab_cab_transactions.due_stlmnt_dt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.cncl_efcte_dttm, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trde_sstm_id, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trx_type_cd, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trx_type_dscrn, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trx_subtype_cd, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trde_stat_flg, 
       cab_cab_transactions.csh_cr_dr_indcr, 
       cab_cab_transactions.long_shrt_indcr, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_crncy, 
       cab_cab_transactions.stlmt_crncy, 
       cab_cab_transactions.nomin_qty, 
       cab_cab_transactions.price, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_cst, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_cst, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_book_cst, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_book_cst, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_sell_prcds, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_sell_prcds, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_gnls, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_gnls, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_acrd_intrt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_acrd_intrt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.stlmt_crncy_stlmt_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_net_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_net_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.fx_bght_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.fx_sold_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_crncy_stlmt_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_net_incme, 
       cab_cab_transactions.dvnd_crncy_net_incme, 
       cab_cab_transactions.dvnd_type_cd, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_intrt_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_intrt_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_dvdnd_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_dvdnd_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_sundry_inc_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_sundry_inc_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.bnk_csh_cptl_secid, 
       cab_cab_transactions.bnk_csh_inc_secid, 
       cab_cab_transactions.reportdate, 
       cab_cab_transactions.filename, 
        sysdate, 
       'e483448' 
   FROM cab_cfg_trx_type_mapping RIGHT JOIN(cab_cab_tran_adjustments 
      INNER JOIN cab_cab_transactions ON(cab_cab_transactions.branchcode = cab_cab_tran_adjustments.branchcode ) 
       AND(cab_cab_tran_adjustments.sstm_trx_id = cab_cab_transactions.sstm_trx_id)) ON(cab_cfg_trx_type_mapping.cab_trx_type_cd = cab_cab_transactions.trx_type_cd) 
       AND(nvl(cab_cfg_trx_type_mapping.cab_trx_subtype_cd,' ') = nvl(cab_cab_transactions.trx_subtype_cd,' ') 
       AND (cab_cfg_trx_type_mapping.branchcode=cab_cab_transactions.branchcode)) 
      WHERE cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_cd IN 
       (SELECT DISTINCT prtfo_cd 
        FROM cab_cab_valuations_working 
        WHERE created_by = 'e483448' 
          AND branchcode='ISA') 
       AND cab_cab_tran_adjustments.efcte_dttm > '2011-07-31' 
       AND cab_cab_tran_adjustments.efcte_dttm <= '2011-08-31' 
       AND eff_trde_stat_flg <> 'X' 
       AND cab_cab_transactions.branchcode = 'ISA' 
       AND cab_cab_tran_adjustments.branchcode = 'ISA' 
       AND(cab_cfg_trx_type_mapping.cab_reportgroup = 'CABValuation' OR cab_cfg_trx_type_mapping.cab_reportgroup IS NULL)

问题在distinct上面，它会导致对全表扫描，而且会导致排序，然后删除重复的记录，所以速度很慢，因此需要优化distinct。查了不少资料，并逐一尝试，最后发现了一个非常可观的优化结果，用group by。语句如下：

SELECT   'AMEND_NEW', 
       reporttitle, 
       reportsubtitle, 
       cab_cab_transactions.branchcode, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_cd, 
       cab_cab_transactions.sstm_scrty_id, 
       cab_cab_transactions.sstm_trx_id, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trde_dttm, 
       cab_cab_transactions.efcte_dttm, 
       cab_cab_transactions.due_stlmnt_dt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.cncl_efcte_dttm, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trde_sstm_id, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trx_type_cd, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trx_type_dscrn, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trx_subtype_cd, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trde_stat_flg, 
       cab_cab_transactions.csh_cr_dr_indcr, 
       cab_cab_transactions.long_shrt_indcr, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_crncy, 
       cab_cab_transactions.stlmt_crncy, 
       cab_cab_transactions.nomin_qty, 
       cab_cab_transactions.price, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_cst, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_cst, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_book_cst, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_book_cst, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_sell_prcds, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_sell_prcds, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_gnls, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_gnls, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_acrd_intrt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_acrd_intrt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.stlmt_crncy_stlmt_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_net_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_net_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.fx_bght_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.fx_sold_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_crncy_stlmt_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_net_incme, 
       cab_cab_transactions.dvnd_crncy_net_incme, 
       cab_cab_transactions.dvnd_type_cd, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_intrt_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_intrt_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_dvdnd_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_dvdnd_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_sundry_inc_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_sundry_inc_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.bnk_csh_cptl_secid, 
       cab_cab_transactions.bnk_csh_inc_secid, 
       cab_cab_transactions.reportdate, 
       cab_cab_transactions.filename, 
        sysdate, 
       'e483448' 
   FROM cab_cfg_trx_type_mapping RIGHT JOIN(cab_cab_tran_adjustments 
      INNER JOIN cab_cab_transactions ON(cab_cab_transactions.branchcode = cab_cab_tran_adjustments.branchcode ) 
       AND(cab_cab_tran_adjustments.sstm_trx_id = cab_cab_transactions.sstm_trx_id)) ON(cab_cfg_trx_type_mapping.cab_trx_type_cd = cab_cab_transactions.trx_type_cd) 
       AND(nvl(cab_cfg_trx_type_mapping.cab_trx_subtype_cd,' ') = nvl(cab_cab_transactions.trx_subtype_cd,' ') 
       AND (cab_cfg_trx_type_mapping.branchcode=cab_cab_transactions.branchcode)) 
      WHERE cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_cd IN 
       (SELECT DISTINCT prtfo_cd 
        FROM cab_cab_valuations_working 
        WHERE created_by = 'e483448' 
          AND branchcode='ISA') 
       AND cab_cab_tran_adjustments.efcte_dttm > '2011-07-31' 
       AND cab_cab_tran_adjustments.efcte_dttm <= '2011-08-31' 
       AND eff_trde_stat_flg <> 'X' 
       AND cab_cab_transactions.branchcode = 'ISA' 
       AND cab_cab_tran_adjustments.branchcode = 'ISA' 
       AND(cab_cfg_trx_type_mapping.cab_reportgroup = 'CABValuation' OR cab_cfg_trx_type_mapping.cab_reportgroup IS NULL) 
       GROUP BY  reporttitle, 
       reportsubtitle, 
       cab_cab_transactions.branchcode, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_cd, 
       cab_cab_transactions.sstm_scrty_id, 
       cab_cab_transactions.sstm_trx_id, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trde_dttm, 
       cab_cab_transactions.efcte_dttm, 
       cab_cab_transactions.due_stlmnt_dt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.cncl_efcte_dttm, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trde_sstm_id, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trx_type_cd, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trx_type_dscrn, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trx_subtype_cd, 
       cab_cab_transactions.trde_stat_flg, 
       cab_cab_transactions.csh_cr_dr_indcr, 
       cab_cab_transactions.long_shrt_indcr, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_crncy, 
       cab_cab_transactions.stlmt_crncy, 
       cab_cab_transactions.nomin_qty, 
       cab_cab_transactions.price, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_cst, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_cst, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_book_cst, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_book_cst, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_sell_prcds, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_sell_prcds, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_gnls, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_gnls, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_acrd_intrt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_acrd_intrt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.stlmt_crncy_stlmt_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_net_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_net_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.fx_bght_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.fx_sold_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_crncy_stlmt_amt, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_net_incme, 
       cab_cab_transactions.dvnd_crncy_net_incme, 
       cab_cab_transactions.dvnd_type_cd, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_intrt_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_intrt_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_dvdnd_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_dvdnd_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.lcl_sundry_inc_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.prtfo_sundry_inc_pd_rec, 
       cab_cab_transactions.bnk_csh_cptl_secid, 
       cab_cab_transactions.bnk_csh_inc_secid, 
       cab_cab_transactions.reportdate, 
       cab_cab_transactions.filename

最后执行时间只有15.1秒，快了60多倍，不得不说这优化效果还是很可观的。不过查了很多资料，仍然没有发现合理地解释：为什么distinct 和group by的效率会有这么大差别。查的很多资料，讲的基本都是两者相差不大，实现也差不多。有待解决。

DISTINCT和GROUP BY这两者本质上应该没有可比性，distinct 取出唯一列，group by 是分组，但有时候在优化的时候，在没有聚合函数的时候，他们查出来的结果也一样。

 类似资料：
  • Oracle中的SQL优化

    问题内容： 我们使用的是Oracle 11，最近我购买了Dell SQL Optimizer（Xpert Toad软件包随附）。今天早上，我们有一条声明要花比正常运行更长的时间，而在最终使它运行（创建时缺少某些条件）之后，我很好奇，以前从未使用过任何SQL优化器，它将更改为。它返回了同一条语句的150多种变体，但成本最低的语句仅添加到了以下行中。 我们已经有o.curdate> 0，并添加了“ +

  • 使用GROUPBY的oracle sql查询

    我有下面的模式， 学生（名字、姓氏、SID） 已注册（学生ID、课程ID） 课程（CID、课程名称、系） 我需要找出哪些学生上的课比课多。和位位于类别中。我有以下查询，其中列出了所有注册课程的学生以及他们注册了多少课程。 不太确定如何将这个数字与那些注册信息技术课程的人进行比较。

  • 优化Oracle查询

    问题内容： 此查询需要153秒才能运行。中有数百万行。 我认为查询要花很长时间，因为where子句中的功能。但是，我需要在列上执行ltrim rtrim，而且日期也必须在格式上匹配。如何优化此查询？ 说明计划： 首要的关键： 索引： 但是，在解释计划中，我看不到使用索引/主键。那是问题吗？ 问题答案： 试试这个： 如果尚无时间，请从其外观（出生日期？）上删除该对象。除此之外，您还需要一些索引工作。

  • Oracle 优化教程

    本篇章主要介绍 Oracle 优化方面的相关内容，包括查询、存储效率优化、Oracle 性能优化、Oracle 计划等内容。

  • 在Oracle中Hibernate HQL GroupBy

  • 优化oracle jdbc批插入

    我需要使用JDBC在Oracle数据库中进行大量插入，即两位数百万。为此，我使用了类似于以下类的东西，灵感来自使用JDBC进行批处理插入的高效方法： 虽然这种插入方式很好，但速度非常慢。JDBC batch insert performance描述了MySQL基本上可以解决这个问题，因为在Oracle上似乎不存在，但在这里没有太大帮助。 为了提高性能，我还尝试将语句切换为一个大的

相关阅读

Oracle中的SQL调优Tensorflow：使用Adam优化器Android中使用ViewStub实现布局优化实例分析ORACLE数据库性能优化Android中SparseArray性能优化的使用方法

相关文章

DP优化（二）斜率优化实例讲解MySQL查询优化与调优优化堆排序Scipy优化算法Sql优化-Join-2

相关问答

使用并行化优化批量更新使用AI技术优化参数优化MongoDB调用Gekko优化使用MySQL查询或javascript优化数据

相关工具

Polr 中文优化版esoTalk 中文优化版WordPress中文优化版NCMusicEngine 优化Oracle

相关文档

Oracle 优化教程微 PE 优盘工具箱 使用说明书怎样优化 Pentium 系列处理器的代码Oracle RAC 集群Oracle 基础教程
快捷导航： 新手教程 算法原理 架构设计 Java进阶 数据库进阶 大厂专栏 面试经验 编程笔记 编程问答 所有专题 文档资料 工具软件 电子书籍 小牛导航
在线工具： 房贷计算器 个税计算器 Linux命令查询 Json格式化 正则表达式 颜色转换 AES加解密 SHA1加密 MD5加密 毒鸡汤 字数统计 随机密码生成 进制转换 Base64编解码 励志句子
Copyright © 2019-2024 小牛知识库@xnip.cn. All Rights Reserved.