ExecutorService由多个线程执行单个任务n次（n个线程“种族”）

Question

ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
Callable<String> task = () -> {
    someTask();
    return "";
};
Set<Callable<String>> tasks = new HashSet<>();
IntStream.range(0, n).forEach(i -> {
    tasks.add(task);
    executor.submit(task);
});

Answer 1

这里有一个建议：

class Task implements Callable<Integer> {

    private final static Random RND = new Random();

    @Override
    public Integer call() throws Exception {
        try {
            // Work on task for a random duration
            Thread.sleep(RND.nextInt(5000));
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            System.err.println("I was interrupted."
                    + "Someone else probably solved the task before me.");
            return -1;
        }

        // Return some dummy value
        return RND.nextInt();
    }
}

class Scratch {
    public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {

        final int numWorkers = 3; // number of tasks to run in parallel

        ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(numWorkers);

        // Solve task 5 times. (Change it to while (true) { ...} if you like.)
        for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {

            CompletionService<Integer> completionService =
                    new ExecutorCompletionService<>(executor);

            Future<?>[] futures = new Future<?>[numWorkers];
            for (int j = 0; j < numWorkers; j++) {
                futures[j] = completionService.submit(new Task());
            }

            Future<Integer> firstToComplete = completionService.take();

            try {
                Integer result = firstToComplete.get();
                System.err.println("We got a result: " + result);
            } catch (ExecutionException e) {
                // Should not happen. Future has completed.
            }

            // Cancel all futures (it doesn't matter that we're cancelling
            // the one that has already completed).
            for (int j = 0; j < numWorkers; j++) {
                futures[j].cancel(true);
            }
        }

        executor.shutdown();
    }
}

如果您要解决的任务不响应中断，则将true传递给cancel(...)将不会有帮助。在这种情况下，我建议您做以下更改：

1. 在外部for循环中创建AtomicBoolean Done变量。
2. 将此传递给task的构造函数，并将其保存在task的字段中。
3. 在任务求解过程中，经常检查已完成标志，如果已完成为真则取消尝试。
4. 在第一个结果输入后，不要对任务调用cancel，而是将done设置为true并等待其他线程返回。