select version()
output:
5.7.15-log
select version()
output:
5.7.19
一. 出现的第一个问题是RDS线上mysql的查询速度始终没有测试库的快,相同的数据和存储结构,索引数据都相同(一开始线上使用count完全不能查询,会出现等待超时).
1. 查看索引
show index from consumer.class;
output:
'class', '0', 'PRIMARY', '1', 'id', 'A', '28663646', NULL, NULL, '', 'BTREE', '', ''
'class', '0', 'UQE_class_loginName', '1', 'loginName', 'A', '28663646', NULL, NULL, 'YES', 'BTREE', '', ''
'class', '1', 'IDX_class_school_id', '1', 'school_id', 'A', '211268', NULL, NULL, '', 'BTREE', '', ''
'class', '1', 'grade_id', '1', 'grade_id', 'A', '8644', NULL, NULL, 'YES', 'BTREE', '', ''
'class', '1', 'schuid', '1', 'schuid', 'A', '216557', NULL, NULL, 'YES', 'BTREE', '', ''
2. 测试时间
set profiling = 1;
SELECT count(*) FROM consumer.class;
show profiles;
3. 分别分析sql的执行
explain select count(*) from consumer.class ;
test output:
'1', 'SIMPLE', 'class', NULL, 'index', NULL, 'IDX_class_school_id', '4', NULL, '28663646', '100.00', 'Using index'
online output:
1
1
SIMPLE
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
Select tables optimized away
发现线上版本的mysql是经过自己编译器优化的Select tables optimized away,但是效率确实低到不能接受(单独这样查询几分钟过后仍然查不出来,并且显示超时),这是因为mysql5.7.*版本机制相关的问题,具体可参考:
https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=80580
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27377549/select-count-not-using-index
4. 强制使用索引,解决了上面线上查询几分钟仍不能查询到结果后返回超时的问题
select count(`id`) from consumer.class force index(primary) where id > 0
explain select count(`id`) from consumer.class force index(primary) where id > 0
但是线上RDS速度仍然不尽人意,需要大概2分多钟,而测试自建的在10-20秒,目前猜测是因为线上RDS使用的是机械硬盘,而我们测试环境自建的为SSD.因为是阿里云的RDS,所以不知道内部做了些什么处理.
5. 使用mysql 事件和触发器解决,定时执行事件event进行统计并插入一个专门用于记录的统计表,然后触发器监听指定表的insert和delete操作,分别对记录进行加1和减1.
可参考我如下sql创建:
use consumer;
CREATE TABLE `class_count` (
`key` varchar(50) NOT NULL,
`value` varchar(100) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`key`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
CREATE TABLE `school_count` (
`key` varchar(50) NOT NULL,
`value` varchar(100) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`key`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
drop event `consumer`.`update_class_count_1`;
CREATE EVENT `consumer`.`update_class_count_1`
ON SCHEDULE EVERY 10 day
STARTS '2017-09-22 01:00:00' ON COMPLETION NOT PRESERVE
ENABLE
DO INSERT INTO consumer.class_count (`key`, `value`)
VALUES ('cal_count',(select count(*) from consumer.class force INDEX (IDX_class_school_id) where `school_id` != 0))
ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE value=VALUES(value);
drop event `consumer`.`update_school_count`;
CREATE EVENT `consumer`.`update_school_count`
ON SCHEDULE EVERY 10 DAY
STARTS '2017-09-22 18:16:04' ON COMPLETION NOT PRESERVE
ENABLE
DO INSERT INTO consumer.school_count (`key`, `value`)
VALUES ('cal_count', (select count(`id`) from consumer.school_login force index(primary) where id > 0))
ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE value=VALUES(value);
DROP TRIGGER IF EXISTS `consumer`.`count_down_class`;
CREATE TRIGGER `consumer`.`count_down_class`
AFTER DELETE ON consumer.class
FOR EACH ROW
UPDATE `class_count`
SET
`class_count`.`value` = `class_count`.`value` - 1
WHERE
`class_count`.`key` = "cal_count";
DROP TRIGGER IF EXISTS `consumer`.`count_down_school`;
CREATE TRIGGER `consumer`.`count_down_school`
AFTER DELETE ON consumer.school_login
FOR EACH ROW
UPDATE `school_count`
SET
`school_count`.`value` = `school_count`.`value` - 1
WHERE
`school_count`.`key` = "cal_count";
DROP TRIGGER IF EXISTS `consumer`.`count_up_class`;
CREATE TRIGGER `consumer`.`count_up_class`
AFTER INSERT ON consumer.class
FOR EACH ROW
UPDATE `class_count`
SET
`class_count`.`value` = `class_count`.`value` + 1
WHERE
`class_count`.`key` = "cal_count";
DROP TRIGGER IF EXISTS `consumer`.`count_up_school`;
CREATE TRIGGER `consumer`.`count_up_school`
AFTER INSERT ON consumer.school_login
FOR EACH ROW
UPDATE `school_count`
SET
`school_count`.`value` = `school_count`.`value` + 1
WHERE
`school_count`.`key` = "cal_count";
这里线上RDS特别需要注意,我也是看了好久,因为mysql开启event必须设置SET GLOBAL event_scheduler = 1; 开启事件功能,否则就算创建了也不会生效,而RDS执行这个sql指令的时候,一直提示我没有super权限(测试库自建的mysql可以直接设置),但是我确实是使用root用户登录的,后来在DMS的RDS的管理界面看到有此参数配置,手动修改下就生效了.完成后可以使用SHOW VARIABLES LIKE ‘event_scheduler’,需要看到’event_scheduler’, ‘ON’,最后检查下events和triggers有没有创建好
SHOW TRIGGERS;
SHOW EVENTS;
另外,count(),count(1) 和 count([column])我这里经过测试,两者执行时间基本一致,查阅相关资料发现mysql解释器会自动优化count(),所以从执行效率上说count(),count(1)和count([column])实际执行效率几乎相同,都是经过了解释器优化的.而”InnoDB handles SELECT COUNT() and SELECT COUNT(1) operations in the same way. There is no performance difference.”,即count(*) = count(1) 计数包括null,count([column])计数不包括null,可参阅mysql 5.6中文档:
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/innodb-restrictions.html
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/group-by-functions.html#function_count
注意:使用offset的时候,因为mysql不知道数据表的行数据是否连续,所以需要遍历数据表进行查找,offset的值越大,查询的速度耗时越长,我这里limit 20 offset 30579060,耗时约60-70秒,如果不要求精确度,可以用where id来进行获取,这样就不会从头遍历到offset 30579060,当然如果业务允许的情况,比如如果不使用innode的事务,更倾向使用MYISAM的话,将会是一个更好的解决方案