在正在测试的同一类中模拟私有方法

Question

我有一个名为Java的Java类MyClass，我想用JUnit进行测试。methodA我要测试的公共方法调用methodB同一类中的私有方法，以确定要遵循的条件路径。我的目标是为中的不同路径编写JUnit测试methodA。另外，methodB调用服务，因此我不希望在运行JUnit测试时实际执行该服务。

模拟methodB和控制其返回值以便我可以测试“ methodA”的不同路径的最佳方法是什么？

我更喜欢在编写模拟时使用JMockit，因此我对适用于JMockit的任何答案特别感兴趣。

这是我的示例类：

public class MyClass  {

    public String methodA(CustomObject object1, CustomObject object2)  {

        if(methodB(object1, object2))  {
            // Do something.
            return "Result";
        }

        // Do something different.
        return "Different Result";

    }

    private boolean methodB(CustomObject custObject1, CustomObject custObject2)  {

        /* For the sake of this example, assume the CustomObject.getSomething()
         * method makes a service call and therefore is placed in this separate
         * method so that later an integration test can be written.
         */
        Something thing1 = cobject1.getSomething();
        Something thing2 = cobject2.getSomething();

        if(thing1 == thing2)  {
            return true;
        }
        return false;
    }

}

这是我到目前为止所拥有的：

public class MyClassTest  {
    MyClass myClass = new MyClass();

    @Test
    public void test_MyClass_methodA_enters_if_condition()  {
        CustomObject object1 = new CustomObject("input1");
        CustomObject object2 = new CustomObject("input2");

        //  How do I mock out methodB here to return true?

        assertEquals(myClass.methodA(object1, object2), "Result");
    }

    @Test
    public void test_MyClass_methodA_skips_if_condition()  {
        CustomObject object1 = new CustomObject("input1");
        CustomObject object2 = new CustomObject("input2");

        //  How do I mock out methodB here to return false?

        assertEquals(myClass.methodA(object1, object2), "Different Result");
    }

}

谢谢！

Answer 1

给出您要求的答案（使用JMockit的部分模拟）：

public class MyClassTest
{
    @Tested MyClass myClass;

    @Test
    public void test_MyClass_methodA_enters_if_condition() {
        final CustomObject object1 = new CustomObject("input1");
        final CustomObject object2 = new CustomObject("input2");

        new NonStrictExpectations(myClass) {{
            invoke(myClass, "methodB", object1, object2); result = true;
        }};

        assertEquals("Result", myClass.methodA(object1, object2));
    }

    @Test
    public void test_MyClass_methodA_skips_if_condition() {
        final CustomObject object1 = new CustomObject("input1");
        final CustomObject object2 = new CustomObject("input2");

        new NonStrictExpectations(myClass) {{
            invoke(myClass, "methodB", object1, object2); result = false;
        }};

        assertEquals("Different Result", myClass.methodA(object1, object2));
    }
}

但是，我 不 建议这样做。通常，private不应模拟方法。而是模拟被测单元的实际外部依赖关系（CustomObject在这种情况下）：

public class MyTestClass
{
    @Tested MyClass myClass;
    @Mocked CustomObject object1;
    @Mocked CustomObject object2;

    @Test
    public void test_MyClass_methodA_enters_if_condition() {
        new NonStrictExpectations() {{
            Something thing = new Something();
            object1.getSomething(); result = thing;
            object2.getSomething(); result = thing;
        }};

        assertEquals("Result", myClass.methodA(object1, object2));
    }

    @Test
    public void test_MyClass_methodA_skips_if_condition() {
        new NonStrictExpectations() {{
            object1.getSomething(); result = new Something();
            object2.getSomething(); result = new Something();
        }};

        assertEquals("Different Result", myClass.methodA(object1, object2));
    }
}